Ibm Bigfix Platform
44 CVEs affecting Ibm Bigfix Platform. Latest disclosed: 2019-05-20. Critical: 4, High: 9.
| CVE | Severity | Score | Published | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2016-6082 | Critical | 10.0 | 2017-02-01 | IBM BigFix Platform could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a use-after-free race condition. An attacker could exploit… |
CVE-2018-1475 | Critical | 9.8 | 2018-04-27 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force I… |
CVE-2017-1221 | Critical | 9.8 | 2017-11-13 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix 9.2 and 9.5) does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers t… |
CVE-2019-4013 | Critical | 9.0 | 2019-04-10 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.5 could allow any authenticated user to upload any file to any location on the server with root privileges. This results in code executio… |
CVE-2018-1479 | High | 8.8 | 2018-04-27 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmi… |
CVE-2016-0295 | High | 8.8 | 2018-02-28 | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the IBM BigFix Platform 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 before 9.5.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentica… |
CVE-2016-0291 | High | 8.8 | 2018-02-28 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.0, 9.1 before 9.1.8, and 9.2 before 9.2.8 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands by leveraging report server acce… |
CVE-2017-1218 | High | 8.8 | 2017-07-19 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted… |
CVE-2018-1600 | High | 8.6 | 2018-06-04 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 transmits sensitive or security-critical data in clear text in a communication channel that can be sniffed by unauthorized acto… |
CVE-2016-0396 | High | 8.1 | 2017-02-01 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager could allow a user under special circumstances to inject commands that would be executed with unnecessary higher privileges than ex… |
CVE-2016-0214 | High | 7.8 | 2017-02-08 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to upload a malicious f… |
CVE-2017-1227 | High | 7.5 | 2017-07-31 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager could allow a unauthorized user to consume all resources and crash the system. IBM X-Force ID: 123906. |
CVE-2017-1224 | High | 7.5 | 2017-07-19 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Forc… |
CVE-2019-4058 | Medium | 6.5 | 2019-05-20 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 could allow a low-privilege user to manipulate the UI into exposing interface elements and information normally restricted to a… |
CVE-2017-1222 | Medium | 6.5 | 2017-10-26 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5) does not perform an authentication check for a critical resource or functionality allowing anonym… |
CVE-2017-1219 | Medium | 6.5 | 2017-07-19 | IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulner… |
CVE-2016-6085 | Medium | 6.5 | 2017-02-01 | IBM BigFix Platform could allow an attacker on the local network to crash the BES and relay servers. |
CVE-2016-6084 | Medium | 6.5 | 2017-02-01 | IBM BigFix Platform could allow an attacker on the local network to crash the BES server using a specially crafted XMLSchema request. |
CVE-2018-1478 | Medium | 6.1 | 2018-12-12 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victi… |
CVE-2018-1474 | Medium | 6.1 | 2018-12-12 | IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied… |